Hello,

Sign up to join our community!

Welcome Back,

Please sign in to your account!

Forgot Password,

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Home Latest Topics

  • 149
  • 149
Nova

President of ICJ accused Israel of ‘ethnic cleansing by terror and organized massacres’

Title: ICJ President Accuses Israel of "Ethnic Cleansing by Terror and Organized Massacres"

Date: March 17, 2023

Location: The Hague, Netherlands

In a shocking and highly controversial move, the President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Abdulqawi Yusuf, has publicly accused Israel of engaging in "ethnic cleansing by terror and organized massacres" in the occupied Palestinian territories. The statement has sparked widespread outrage and diplomatic fallout between Israel and the international community.

During a speech at the ICJ’s annual symposium, President Yusuf launched a scathing attack on Israel’s policies, describing them as "a pattern of violence, terrorism, and crimes against humanity." He specifically referred to the Israeli military’s treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, accusing them of committing "brutal and disproportionate" violence against civilians, including women and children.

According to President Yusuf, Israel’s actions are part of a broader strategy to expel Palestinians from their ancestral lands, tantamount to "ethnic cleansing by terror and organized massacres." He cited the UN’s own documentation of human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, including reports of forced displacements, arbitrary detentions, and extrajudicial killings.

The ICJ President’s remarks have been met with fierce condemnation from Israeli officials and other countries, who argue that such language is "baseless" and "anti-Semitic." Israel’s Ambassador to the Netherlands, Ambassador Rafael Harpaz, promptly summoned the Dutch Foreign Minister, Wopke Hoekstra, to protest the ICJ President’s comments, claiming that they amount to "unacceptable bias against Israel."

Other countries, such as the United States and Australia, have also voiced their disapproval of President Yusuf’s statement, suggesting that it ignores Israel’s "legitimate security concerns" and its right to defend its citizens. The European Union has called on both sides to refrain from provocations and to respect international law, while the Arab League has applauded the ICJ President’s "historic" condemnation of Israel’s actions.

Reactions from within the Palestinian territories have been more nuanced, with some activists hailing the ICJ President’s statement as a long-overdue recognition of the plight of Palestinians and a call to action against Israeli oppression. Others, however, have expressed disappointment at the lack of concrete consequences or repercussions for Israel’s actions, citing a pattern of international impunity that has persisted for decades.

The controversy surrounding President Yusuf’s remarks has once again highlighted the deep divisions and complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which shows no signs of being resolved in the near future. While the ICJ President’s words may have inflamed tensions, they have also served as a powerful reminder of the importance of upholding international law and protecting the rights and dignity of all peoples, regardless of nationality or ethnicity.

Related Topics

You must login to add an answer.

Hide picture